C-UAS DB
← Drone Database

One-Way Attack Cruise Drone

Loitering MunitionThreat: CriticalOpen-Source Verified

Long-range, propeller-driven, one-way attack drone designed for pre-programmed strikes against fixed strategic targets — power grids, ports, airfields, refineries. Distinct from loitering munitions: it does not loiter or hunt. It flies a pre-planned route on GPS + inertial guidance and detonates a heavy warhead on impact. The dominant deep-strike asset of the Russia–Ukraine war and the Houthi campaign in the Red Sea.

Technical Specifications

range
1,000–2,500 km
speed
180–220 km/h
payload
30–90 kg warhead
endurance
8–14 h
frequency
GPS / GNSS + inertial (no return RF link)
cost Estimate
$20,000–$200,000
altitude
60–4,000 m (typically very low)
weight
200–500 kg

Tactical Roles

Strike

Advantages

  • + Massive standoff range — launched from sanctuary
  • + No return RF link — immune to most tactical jamming
  • + Cheap enough to launch in saturating salvos
  • + Forces defender to expend $1M+ SAMs on $50K airframe
  • + Heavy warhead capable of strategic infrastructure damage
  • + Low radar cross-section + low altitude defeats many radars

Disadvantages

  • − Baseline GNSS+inertial variants have no course correction — vulnerable to GPS spoofing; newer visual/inertial navigation variants are not
  • − Slow and non-maneuvering — vulnerable to alerted defenders
  • − Loud piston engine — acoustically detectable on approach
  • − Predictable flight profile once detected
  • − Single-use — no recovery or recall

Real-World Usage

  • ▸ Iranian Shahed-136 / Russian Geran-2 — mass salvos against Ukrainian energy grid (5,000+ launched/month by late 2025 per ISIS analysis)
  • ▸ Shahed-238 / Geran-3 — turbojet variant in serial production from early 2025 (~600 km/h, 90 kg warhead, much harder to intercept)
  • ▸ Houthi Samad-3 / Waid-class — strikes on Saudi/UAE oil infrastructure and Red Sea shipping
  • ▸ Ukrainian Fire Point FP-1 — 1,400–1,600 km range, hitting Russian refineries deep behind front (introduced late 2024)
  • ▸ Ukrainian Liutyi, Bober — long-range strike drones hitting Russian refineries 1,000+ km from front
  • ▸ May 2026: Russia launched 8,161 Shahed-type UAVs against Ukraine in a single month — a new record (ISIS monthly tracker)
  • ▸ May–June 2026: Russian Geran-4 jet-powered variant fielded — ~500 km/h cruise specifically to outrun cheap FPV interceptors
  • ▸ May 2026: Ukrainian GUR (DIU) publishes interactive teardown of Geran-4 components and foreign-component supply chain
  • ▸ May 2026: Large-area GNSS falsification reported reaching hundreds of kilometres into EU/NATO territory, diverting strike drones off planned routes and into neighbouring states' airspace (Lithuania statement, Reuters)
  • ▸ Aug 2026: Jet-powered variant output reported to overtake piston production; launches of jet types rose from roughly 300 in June 2026 to about 1,500 in July, with defending air forces reporting interception slipping from ~92% to ~87% overall
  • ▸ Sep 2026: Defending air force figures separate the threat set — above 90% interception against piston-engine types, but only above 60% against jet-powered types cruising 320–600 km/h at up to 6,000 m, which most cheap interceptors cannot reach
  • ▸ 2026: Jet-powered variants assessed at over $100,000 per airframe (roughly double the piston type) using imported microturbines rated around 480 km/h — still an order of magnitude below the cost of the missiles used against them

Counters This Drone

Countermeasures ranked by effectiveness — tap any system for details

GPS Spoofing / Navigation WarfareHighLaser Directed Energy WeaponHighCounter-UAS Radar SystemHighAcoustic Detection SystemHighInterceptor Drone (Drone-on-Drone)HighMANPADS (Stinger/Igla class)HighHigh-Power Microwave (HPM)HighMedium/Long-Range SAM SystemHighProgrammable Airburst Cannon (30/35/40mm)HighPassive Bistatic / Multistatic RadarHighC-UAS Autocannon / Dedicated AA GunMediumLocalized EMP DeviceMediumDecoys / Signature ManagementMediumAI Vision Detection (EO/IR)MediumNet-Carrying Interceptor DroneMediumSmart Fire-Control OpticMediumRF Jamming SystemLowCyber Takeover / Protocol ExploitationLowDirectional EW Rifle / Jammer GunLowRF Detection / Spectrum AnalyzerLowSmoke / Obscurant ScreenLowAnti-Drone Laser DazzlerLowPhysical Overhead ProtectionLowMan-Portable EW BackpackLowAnti-FPV Net Tunnels & CurtainsLowAcoustic Resonance Disruption (LRAD-class)LowIntegrated C-UAS Battle Management (Sensor Fusion)LowShotgun / Small Arms InterceptNoneNet Gun / Net LauncherNoneFiber-Optic Specific CountermeasuresNonePassive RF GeolocationNoneHardened PNT / CRPA AntennaNone

⚠ How This Drone Evades Defenses

Active adversary tactics — not passive limitations

  • ▸ Flies below most medium-altitude SAM radar coverage
  • ▸ Salvo tactics saturate point defenses — at least some get through
  • ▸ No RF emission in cruise — passive RF geolocation is blind
  • ▸ Mixed with decoys to bait expensive interceptors
  • ▸ Jet-powered variants (Geran-4 class) cruise at ~500 km/h, outside the engagement envelope of most propeller-driven FPV interceptors
  • ▸ Camera/inertial navigation fused with pre-loaded terrain or satellite-imagery references sustains accurate navigation through jammed and spoofed GNSS environments over hundreds of kilometres
  • ▸ Automated evasive manoeuvring — wide-angle cameras and flight-control logic detect a closing interceptor and trigger altitude changes and jinking without operator input

Sources & Further Reading

About our sources