Total threats tracked
29
Low3
Medium8
High10
Critical8
Analytics
Analytics
A live analytical overview of the entire public database. Every figure on this page is computed from the same open-source entries you can browse on Drones and Countermeasures. Numbers update automatically as the catalog grows. For educational and OSINT use — see the disclaimer.
Critical-tier share
28%
8 of 29 entries classified as critical — top-tier threats that demand layered defense.
EW-resistant threats
3
Threats with no electronic-warfare countermeasure rated medium or higher. Jamming alone won't stop them — kinetic or directed-energy layers are required.
Detection-gap threats
4
Threats that evade both radar and acoustic detection. Visual / RF / AI-vision sensors become essential to close the gap.
Most versatile countermeasure
Effective (medium or higher) against 12 of 12 distinct drone categories — the broadest coverage in the database.
Threats by category
Distribution of tracked drone types across the 12 categories in the database.
Methodology
- EW-resistant — a drone with no countermeasure in the Electronic Warfare category rated medium or higher.
- Detection gap — a drone where both radar detection and acoustic detection are rated low or none.
- Most versatile countermeasure — the system covering the highest number of distinct drone categories at medium or higher effectiveness.
- All figures recompute on every page load from
drones.tsandcountermeasures.ts. No values are hardcoded.