Total threats tracked
30
Low3
Medium8
High11
Critical8
Analytics
Analytics
A live analytical overview of the entire public database. Every figure on this page is computed from the same open-source entries you can browse on Drones and Countermeasures. Numbers update automatically as the catalog grows. For educational and OSINT use, see the disclaimer.
Critical-tier share
27%
8 of 30 entries classified as critical, top-tier threats that demand layered defense.
EW-resistant threats
3
Threats with no electronic-warfare countermeasure rated medium or higher. Jamming alone won't stop them: kinetic or directed-energy layers are required.
Detection-gap threats
4
Threats that evade both radar and acoustic detection. Visual / RF / AI-vision sensors become essential to close the gap.
Most versatile countermeasure
Effective (medium or higher) against 12 of 12 distinct drone categories: the broadest coverage in the database.
Threats by category
Distribution of tracked drone types across the 12 categories in the database.
Methodology
- EW-resistant: a drone with no countermeasure in the Electronic Warfare category rated medium or higher.
- Detection gap: a drone where both radar detection and acoustic detection are rated low or none.
- Most versatile countermeasure: the system covering the highest number of distinct drone categories at medium or higher effectiveness.
- All figures are calculated automatically from the drone and countermeasure entries published on this site, and update whenever an entry changes. No figure is typed in by hand.